WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Failed to create a domain with xen-unstable (Error 22:

To: "Xu, Dongxiao" <dongxiao.xu@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Failed to create a domain with xen-unstable (Error 22: Invalid argument)
From: Jun Koi <junkoi2004@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:40:51 +0900
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 23:41:31 -0800
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=OpyZJKQHprwfgzdS1QhOLrihAqq11QMDbZKY7v1FHC8=; b=rarPuTYLQToD6TteCXrAmqJdBrwrk+l583PLmXrzTXoXmfGc4P0ZWOjNCfvEpH4q5D m60cDutTYeh1+3oq1e1NSHFP3s1RPHa5gsUbiQO5MPIbV3uv165E4LjL5fae6ANtQkM7 SlZrHffSoD9ASy/oR7mtQu6/otX8733jCQoPQ=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=TMMMPO0Iu8f5qE9sZyuXqnIk60st0HUYnOMGrxYiQcJ55vvDe5nZW2PwxWkeqpfw8o LDkjoFc8ZipSjA4QYYfv67L4oU8NqrRoyYVl4T659kIXDRTWx74VyIA42lrt8AQpJ3g7 Oqnvqxctis5+0SncobTQb5oe21NqjWoXaVH0g=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <6CADD16F56BC954D8E28F3836FA7ED7112A7932ED8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <fdaac4d51001131957t5ccaf73p8304bce98750b5e7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <2ab84cd81001132106w3558246bidc2dc7004a0658f6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6CADD16F56BC954D8E28F3836FA7ED7112A7932ED8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Xu, Dongxiao <dongxiao.xu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Yes, one VM could own maxium 128 vcpus.
> The failure you meet should be a regression. I am looking into it.

Thanks! Let me know if you need more information.

Anyway, I am wondering how a simple bug like this can evade the
auto-testing process??

Jun

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel