WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.0.0 first release candidate

To: Sassy Natan <sassyn@xxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.0.0 first release candidate
From: Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 07:18:02 -0800 (PST)
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 07:18:37 -0800
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1263309482; bh=VeRv+8g558N2VB0G3KRgfIDy7ti8c7oDBoGLxhnucyg=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=BALia560fhr4hvBZZdsuh+BM/GPGfAoDLaKtPkhwyw2nro48R2fNxlACvJbmaJ6qFHC4KwOi9KPkHfCGcioiGrL7JvrVRwe1Opacdhr/1KqiO+MV52e3rtBPdr5DCDZxpVARgdcWgI/cv+xRZFhctOt4ruv+GFwY2Dj5PIc9/Pc=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=XU6mEJ8/rNUDEySv6DWxecJc1jGiNkp9At8603d52VVdcrtzmd0WdFyygy93ilnfgesMqMG/p1kHBgYkSg5wpCYHQ5k0GYljsO31gE3rNliRT32J5SScXXHwoOfHOnbAFlUC/wmKBZrSgXgGGcVHR8HLCTzzH55BpICFuqq4Zzc=;
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attempt to load Xen 4.0-rc1 with 2.6.31.6 pvops kernel on top of Ubuntu 9.04 server. ( Xen 3.4.3-rc1-pre loads fine with any kernel) :-
dmesg :-

. . . . . . . .

[  499.890371] xend[1609]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895af sp 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
[  499.905480] xend[1612]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c8 sp 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
[  499.934416] xend[1620]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c8 sp 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
[  499.949121] xend[1623]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c8 sp 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
[  499.988220] xend[1633]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c8 sp 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
[  500.013995] xend[1641]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c8 sp 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
[  500.053252] xend[1652]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c8 sp 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
[  500.069849] xend[1657]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c8 sp 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
[  500.085520] xend[1660]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c8 sp 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
[  504.907064] __ratelimit: 205 callbacks suppressed
[  504.907070] xend[2628]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
[  504.922303] xend[2631]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
[  504.937531] xend[2634]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
[  504.952277] xend[2638]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
[  504.966630] xend[2641]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
[  504.981380] xend[2644]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
[  504.996759] xend[2647]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
[  505..012018] xend[2650]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
[  505.026693] xend[2653]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
[  505.041834] xend[2656]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]

Boris.

--- On Tue, 1/12/10, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.0.0 first release candidate
To: "Sassy Natan" <sassyn@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tuesday, January 12, 2010, 6:38 AM

You can use any kernel as dom0 for Xen 4.0, so long as that kernel includes
dom0 support. So that could be 2.6.18, or 2.6.27 from XCI project, or
Jeremy's pv_ops git tree, or some distro kernel. The kernel built by default
by the Xen 4.0 build system will be Jeremy's pv_ops tree, but that doesn't
mean you *have* to use it.

-- Keir

On 12/01/2010 11:31, "Sassy Natan" <sassyn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Keir, Xen Group ...
>  
> Just to make things more clear, I wanted to know which kernel version this
> version support?
> Is it still work with the old stable kernel 2.6.18 or should I grub the new
> version from Jeremy branches?
>  
> To my understating version 4.0 of xen is plan to work by default with the
> pv_ops mechanism on the dom0.
> But at the moment the latest stable kernel 2.6.32.3 does not include a dom0
> support but only domU support (both oldstyle and pv_ops).
>  
> So, Does the release of Xen 4.0 is plan to include Dom0 support in the kernel
> mainline?
>  
> According to Jeremy there is quite more work to do in-order to have Xen Dom0
> support in the kernel mainline. see more here:
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.xen.devel/75992
>  
> Can you please provide more feedback on this issue?
>  
>  
> Thanks for the support, and thanks for publishing to the open source this
> amazing virtualization system.
> Sassy
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>> Folks,
>>
>> The first release candidate for Xen 4.0.0 has been tagged and published.
>>
>> You can grab it from here:
>> http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-unstable.hg (tagged '4.0.0-rc1')
>>
>> Please test it!
>>
>>  -- Keir
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
>



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Attachment: dmesg-xen-4.log.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel