WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 		  
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

[Xen-devel] RE: One question to IST stack for PV guest

from [Kleen, Andi] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] RE: One question to IST stack for PV guest
From: "Kleen, Andi" <andi.kleen@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 22:07:20 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
Acceptlanguage: en-US
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Jiang, Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 08:46:13 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4B2BF93D.6090807@xxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <C8EDE645B81E5141A8C6B2F73FD9265105AE092F76@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B2BF269.5040608@xxxxxxxx> <2E9E6F5F5978EF44A8590E339E888CF90163515DCF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B2BF93D.6090807@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcqALC6zMerwxkX/SZ2pLUaTUfG2vwAAhMPA
Thread-topic: One question to IST stack for PV guest 
>> Both can happen (and also some more like "something happened 
>somewhere, Just FYI").
>> They are all distingushed by different status bits.
>>    
>
>If they're not synchronous, then why not use a normal virq 
>event channel?

As I wrote some classes of MCEs are "synchronous"

-Andi

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  [Xen-devel] RE: One question to IST stack for PV guest, Kleen, Andi
Next by Date:  [Xen-devel] RE: One question to IST stack for PV guest, Kleen, Andi
Previous by Thread:  [Xen-devel] Re: One question to IST stack for PV guest, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Next by Thread:  [Xen-devel] Re: One question to IST stack for PV guest, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]
 
   

Copyright , Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy