xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] RE: Saving/Restoring IA32_TSC_AUX MSR
To: |
"Xu, Dongxiao" <dongxiao.xu@xxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Zhang, Xiantao" <xiantao.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>, "Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@xxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Subject: |
RE: [Xen-devel] RE: Saving/Restoring IA32_TSC_AUX MSR |
From: |
Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Dec 2009 08:12:00 -0800 (PST) |
Cc: |
"Dugger, Donald D" <donald.d.dugger@xxxxxxxxx> |
Delivery-date: |
Fri, 11 Dec 2009 08:13:14 -0800 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<EADF0A36011179459010BDF5142A457501D13FE81E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
> > Yes, but code which uses fast vgetcpu is expecting
> > to get physical cpu and physical node number. Since
> > an HVM guest OS only has access to virtual cpu and
> > virtual node number, the information written to TSC_AUX
> > by a guest OS is misleading and may silently break any
> > userland code that assumes it is getting physical
> > information.
>
> This is depend on how the node info is virtualized.
> If the virtual node could reflect the physical
> node info, what rdtscp returns is valuable to applications.
If it is possible to ensure that the cpu/node info
is virtualized so that TSC_AUX always correctly provides the
information needed by apps, I agree this would be
valuable. I don't see how this is possible, but maybe
you have some creative ideas?
> According to the current PVRDTSC logic, write_rdtscp_aux()
> is called in each scheduling ( schedule()->
> update_vcpu_system_time()->__update_vcpu_system_time()->
> write_rdtscp_aux() ), which is more frequent than
> __context_switch().
OK, I see. Then I am OK with moving the call to write_rdtscp_aux()
Dan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] RE: Saving/Restoring IA32_TSC_AUX MSR, (continued)
- [Xen-devel] RE: Saving/Restoring IA32_TSC_AUX MSR, Dan Magenheimer
- RE: [Xen-devel] RE: Saving/Restoring IA32_TSC_AUX MSR, Xu, Dongxiao
- RE: [Xen-devel] RE: Saving/Restoring IA32_TSC_AUX MSR, Dan Magenheimer
- RE: [Xen-devel] RE: Saving/Restoring IA32_TSC_AUX MSR, Xu, Dongxiao
- RE: [Xen-devel] RE: Saving/Restoring IA32_TSC_AUX MSR, Dan Magenheimer
- Re: [Xen-devel] RE: Saving/Restoring IA32_TSC_AUX MSR, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] RE: Saving/Restoring IA32_TSC_AUX MSR, Zhang, Xiantao
- Re: [Xen-devel] RE: Saving/Restoring IA32_TSC_AUX MSR, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] RE: Saving/Restoring IA32_TSC_AUX MSR, Dan Magenheimer
- RE: [Xen-devel] RE: Saving/Restoring IA32_TSC_AUX MSR, Xu, Dongxiao
- RE: [Xen-devel] RE: Saving/Restoring IA32_TSC_AUX MSR,
Dan Magenheimer <=
- RE: [Xen-devel] RE: Saving/Restoring IA32_TSC_AUX MSR, Nakajima, Jun
- RE: [Xen-devel] RE: Saving/Restoring IA32_TSC_AUX MSR, Dan Magenheimer
- Re: [Xen-devel] RE: Saving/Restoring IA32_TSC_AUX MSR, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- RE: [Xen-devel] RE: Saving/Restoring IA32_TSC_AUX MSR, Dan Magenheimer
- Re: [Xen-devel] RE: Saving/Restoring IA32_TSC_AUX MSR, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- RE: [Xen-devel] RE: Saving/Restoring IA32_TSC_AUX MSR, Nakajima, Jun
- RE: [Xen-devel] RE: Saving/Restoring IA32_TSC_AUX MSR, Dan Magenheimer
- RE: [Xen-devel] RE: Saving/Restoring IA32_TSC_AUX MSR, Nakajima, Jun
- RE: [Xen-devel] RE: Saving/Restoring IA32_TSC_AUX MSR, Dan Magenheimer
- RE: [Xen-devel] RE: Saving/Restoring IA32_TSC_AUX MSR, Xu, Dongxiao
|
|
|