Re: [Xen-devel] libxenlight or libxenheavy?

To:	Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] libxenlight or libxenheavy?
From:	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 1 Dec 2009 14:00:29 +0000
Cc:	Andres Lagar-Cavilla <andres@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Vincent Hanquez <Vincent.Hanquez@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date:	Tue, 01 Dec 2009 05:57:10 -0800
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<C73ACFC6.3382%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<C73ACFC6.3382%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)

I would not apply also 3/14 and 7/14 because of Vincent's comments.

On Tue, 1 Dec 2009, Keir Fraser wrote:
> Applied all but patch 2/14, of the below list. It depended on patch 1/14
> which was nacked. All others I list below are applied as of c/s 20538.
> 
>  -- Keir
> 


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] libxenlight or libxenheavy?