Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] cleanup for __start_xen()

[Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx>]

At 01:16 +0000 on 01 Dec (1259630197), Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> e is moved in [e-(modules_length+modules_headroom), e] range,
> so, s is not overrun e too...

OK, but:
 - this is not obvious (hence this thread);
 - even Keir makes mistakes here from time to time; and
 - it's a single test on code that runs at start of day
so maybe we should just leave it as it was?

Cheers,

Tim.

-- 
Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Principal Software Engineer, Citrix Systems (R&D) Ltd.
[Company #02300071, SL9 0DZ, UK.]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel