WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: extend runstate area updates

To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: extend runstate area updates
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:19:47 +0000
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 01:20:15 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4B0738F7.10700@xxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Citrix Systems, Inc.
References: <4A8ABF4B020000780001049A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1258740598.1022.185.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1258743438.1022.198.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B0738F7.10700@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 00:48 +0000, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: 
> On 11/21/09 02:57, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 18:09 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >   
> >>
> >> I can't see where the guest runstate pointer is supposed to be either
> >> restored or re-setup on resume. I tried adding a setup_runstate_info
> >> to xen_timer_resume (to match the call in xen_timer_setup) but that
> >> seems like it is already too late -- I still see the warnings trigger.
> >> I'm not sure how this is possible since I thought we were in a
> >> stop_machine section at this point.
> >>     
> > The xen_sched_clock calls are as a result of the various printks, e.g.
> > in xen_vcpu_setup, in order to add the timestamp to the output.
> > Therefore we need to ensure we reset the runstate info before any
> > printks.
> >   
> 
> Thanks for investigating this.  Does this mean there was a
> longer-standing bug where the runstate was just completely invalid after
> a save/restore?

I think so, yes.

> > diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> > index f09e8c3..219fb3f 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> > @@ -145,6 +158,8 @@ void xen_vcpu_restore(void)
> >                         HYPERVISOR_vcpu_op(VCPUOP_down, cpu, NULL))
> >                             BUG();
> >  
> > +                   xen_setup_runstate_info(cpu);
> > +
> >                     xen_vcpu_setup(cpu);
> >   
> 
> This is only run when have_vcpu_info_placement is set.  I checked in a
> followup patch to rearrange the loop so that it runs unconditionally,
> but then only does xen_vcpu_setup() when have_vcpu_info_placement.

Make sense, thanks.

I think this is stable material back as far as they are still
maintaining them. The patch which exposed the issue was backported to
3.4.2.

Ian.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel