| 
         
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework
 
On 17/11/2009 03:13, "Zhang, Xiantao" <xiantao.zhang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Is there any way for the dom0 kernel to tell whether the hypervisor is
>> implementing the new ABI, so it can choose how to set up interrupts.
>> 
>> MAP_COMPAT_BIT doesn't seem like a very good name, because it implies
>> that setting it reverts to "compatible" behaviour.  I assume that
>> leaving it clear enables the historical behaviour and setting it
>> enables the new one (since old kernels won't be setting it).
> 
> Maybe better change to MAP_NEW_ABI_BIT ?  Since the hypervisor patch didn't
> change old code path after introducing this bit, so it is very easy and safe
> to backport to xen-3.4-testing tree, and make new dom0 be able to run top of
> it.  :)
It's kind of a shame to need this though. Is there no way for the hypervisor
to work out automatically whether an older dom0 is running? Or work out the
trigger/level stuff for itself (after all it parses the relevant bios tables
just like dom0)?
 -- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- [Xen-devel] APIC rework, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework, Zhang, Xiantao
 
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework, Keir Fraser
 - Re: [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
 - Re: [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework, Keir Fraser
 - RE: [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework, Zhang, Xiantao
 - Re: [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
 - RE: [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework, Zhang, Xiantao
 - Re: [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework,
Keir Fraser <=
 - Re: [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
 - Re: [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework, Keir Fraser
 
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework, Zhang, Xiantao
 - Re: [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework, Keir Fraser
 - RE: [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework, Zhang, Xiantao
 - Re: [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
 - RE: [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework, Zhang, Xiantao
 - Re: [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
 - RE: [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework, Zhang, Xiantao
 
  
  
  
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework, Keir Fraser
 
 
 |  
  
 | 
    |