WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] mm.c:777:d2 Non-privileged (2) attempt to map I/O space

To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] mm.c:777:d2 Non-privileged (2) attempt to map I/O space 000f995a
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:20:56 -0800
Cc: Olivier NOEL <ONOEL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:21:26 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20091109235051.GA20408@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <481249.38422.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A78CA69.3090105@xxxxxxxx> <0E87C0E865217944860BB378D2898000E1467F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <0E87C0E865217944860BB378D2898000E146B1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A7B306D.5080108@xxxxxxxx> <20091109235051.GA20408@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4pre) Gecko/20091014 Fedora/3.0-2.8.b4.fc11 Lightning/1.0pre Thunderbird/3.0b4
On 11/09/09 15:50, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>>> (XEN) mm.c:645:d50 Non-privileged (50) attempt to map I/O space 00000000
>>> (XEN) mm.c:645:d51 Non-privileged (51) attempt to map I/O space 00000000
>>>       
> I can get this with the most recent kernel when PV and QEMU are involved.
> But _not_ if only PV is booted and QEMU is not present.
>   

I'm sorry to say that I'd noticed this myself and quietly ignored it
hoping someone else would root-cause it ;)

It appears to be something wrong with the xenfb driver's mapping which
Xen is complaining about, but I hadn't got further than that.

    J

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel