Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] irq cleanup

To:	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] irq cleanup
From:	Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:54:13 +0000
Cc:
Delivery-date:	Tue, 27 Oct 2009 05:54:48 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<4AE6EC90020000780001C2E9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	AcpW+9jPjJDibXfAS8eIkAvVmN8kCwACLyCB
Thread-topic:	[Xen-devel] [PATCH] irq cleanup
User-agent:	Microsoft-Entourage/12.20.0.090605

On 27/10/2009 11:50, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Make IRQ related data const or __read_mostly where possible/reasonable,
> use platform_legacy_irq() where feasible, and remove the now unused
> definition of vector_to_irq().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>

Neither of your two cleanup patches applies cleanly for me. Please re-send
as attachments.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-devel] [PATCH] irq cleanup, Jan Beulich Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] irq cleanup, Keir Fraser <= [Xen-devel] [PATCH] irq cleanup, Jan Beulich

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] irq cleanup