Re: [Xen-devel] XEN_DOMINF_cpu{mask,shift} ???

To:	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] XEN_DOMINF_cpu{mask,shift} ???
From:	Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 21 Oct 2009 12:31:27 +0100
Cc:
Delivery-date:	Wed, 21 Oct 2009 04:31:55 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<4ADF0A1A020000780001B194@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	AcpSQCR6dgYnh2N5Tue6PhpGFVj0CwAAeJjG
Thread-topic:	[Xen-devel] XEN_DOMINF_cpu{mask,shift} ???
User-agent:	Microsoft-Entourage/12.20.0.090605

On 21/10/2009 12:18, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Are these planned to be used for something? Or are they dead remains of
> some earlier code? At least they don't seem to be used in current code in
> any way, and if they were they would represent an artificial limitation to
> 256 physcial CPUs...

They're relics. Should be removed.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] XEN_DOMINF_cpu{mask,shift} ???