WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] xen: Disable stack protector for irq helper

To: Bastian Blank <bastian@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>, Stable Kernel <stable@xxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] xen: Disable stack protector for irq helper
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 17:36:02 -0700
Cc:
Delivery-date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 17:36:29 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20091005224310.GA32144@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20091004183013.GA26101@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4AC92A65.40806@xxxxxxxx> <20091005013517.GA6081@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4ACA2AFD.4080305@xxxxxxxx> <20091005224310.GA32144@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.1) Gecko/20090814 Fedora/3.0-2.6.b3.fc11 Lightning/1.0pre Thunderbird/3.0b3
On 10/05/09 15:43, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 10:21:01AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>   
>>> Save all caller-saved registers on x86_32 for the paravirt callee saved
>>> registers.
>>>       
>> That looks better, but it is still overkill.  We only need to save the
>> set of registers the ABI requires the callee to preserve.  What
>> additional register(s) gets clobbered by stack-protector that need to be
>> saved?
>>     
> Well, exactly the two, ecx and edx. eax is still clobbered by the return
> value. Anyway, it works in praxis.

I'm confused.  It already saves ecx, so what else needs saving?

Besides, most of the code in that file isn't used unless you're using a
very old version of Xen; it will generally prefer to use the ones in
xen-asm_X.S.

I have the feeling we haven't really found the root cause of your
problem yet.

Thanks,
    J


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>