|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] newer dom0 kernel / xen-unstable git kernel tree
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 07:31:30PM +1000, James Harper wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xen-devel-
> > bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Pasi Kärkkäinen
> > Sent: Wednesday, 23 September 2009 16:58
> > To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
> > Cc: J. Roeleveld; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Thiago Camargo Martins
> > Cordeiro; keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] newer dom0 kernel / xen-unstable git kernel tree
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 09:52:37AM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 04:28:56PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> > > > On 09/22/09 16:26, Thiago Camargo Martins Cordeiro wrote:
> > > > > Gotcha!
> > > > >
> > > > > To make use of the latest pv_ops dom0 need I the xen-unstable tree?
> > > > > Or can I use the Xen 3.4.1 / 3.3.2 from xen.org <http://xen.org>?
> > > >
> > > > There's no close tie between dom0 and Xen itself; it should work with
> > > > any fairly recent version of Xen (and if it doesn't that's interesting
> > > > information).
> > > >
> > >
> > > Works for me with Xen 3.4.1 hypervisor.
> > >
> > > Earlier I used it with Xen 3.3.1.
> > >
> >
> > .. but I forgot to mention that 3.3.1 needs some extra (backported) patches.
> >
> > So Xen 3.4.x or newer is a safe choise.
> >
> > See: http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenParavirtOps
> >
>
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `processor_cntl_xen_prepare':
> (.text+0x50aba): undefined reference to `acpi_processor_get_performance_info'
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `processor_cntl_xen_prepare':
> (.text+0x50ad9): undefined reference to `acpi_processor_get_psd'
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `xenfb_init':
> xen-fbfront.c:(.init.text+0xd62): undefined reference to
> `__xenbus_register_frontend'
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `xenkbd_init':
> xen-kbdfront.c:(.init.text+0x7b48): undefined reference to
> `__xenbus_register_frontend'
> make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
>
> Is there a .config file that is known to work?
>
Here's my (working) .config for 2.6.31-rc8:
http://pasik.reaktio.net/xen/pv_ops-dom0-debug/config-2.6.31-rc8-rebase-master-no-highpte
Sorry I don't have the 2.6.31-final .config online atm.
That's for 32bit PAE. It's originally based on some 2.6.29 fedora kernel
.config, and changed many times pretty randomly after that.. good luck :)
You could also grab http://fedorapeople.org/~myoung/dom0/ kernel and
extract the .config from them..
-- Pasi
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] newer dom0 kernel / xen-unstable git kernel tree, (continued)
- RE: [Xen-devel] newer dom0 kernel / xen-unstable git kernel tree, James Harper
- Re: [Xen-devel] newer dom0 kernel / xen-unstable git kernel tree,
Pasi Kärkkäinen <=
- RE: [Xen-devel] newer dom0 kernel / xen-unstable git kernel tree, James Harper
- RE: [Xen-devel] newer dom0 kernel / xen-unstable git kernel tree, James Harper
- Re: [Xen-devel] newer dom0 kernel / xen-unstable git kernel tree, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- RE: [Xen-devel] newer dom0 kernel / xen-unstable git kernel tree, James Harper
- Re: [Xen-devel] newer dom0 kernel / xen-unstable git kernel tree, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] newer dom0 kernel / xen-unstable git kernel tree, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] newer dom0 kernel / xen-unstable git kernel tree, Pasi Kärkkäinen
- Re: [Xen-devel] newer dom0 kernel / xen-unstable git kernel tree, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
|
|
|
|
|