|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] rdtscP and xen (and maybe the app-tsc answer I've been l
On 09/22/09 13:22, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
> The reason is to improve performance while preserving
> correctness for applications that need to do tens-to-hundreds
> of thousands "timestamp reads" without changing the underlying
> OS. Whether this is a GOOD reason is subject to interpretation,
> but it is a reason.
>
I don't think there's anything new to add to this line of discussion.
J
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] rdtscP and xen (and maybe the app-tsc answer I've been looking for), (continued)
- RE: [Xen-devel] rdtscP and xen (and maybe the app-tsc answer I've been looking for), Dan Magenheimer
- Re: [Xen-devel] rdtscP and xen (and maybe the app-tsc answer I've been looking for), Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- RE: [Xen-devel] rdtscP and xen (and maybe the app-tsc answer I've been looking for), Dan Magenheimer
- Re: [Xen-devel] rdtscP and xen (and maybe the app-tsc answer I've been looking for),
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <=
- RE: [Xen-devel] rdtscP and xen (and maybe the app-tsc answer I've been looking for), Jan Beulich
- RE: [Xen-devel] rdtscP and xen (and maybe the app-tsc answer I've been looking for), Dan Magenheimer
- RE: [Xen-devel] rdtscP and xen (and maybe the app-tsc answer I've been looking for), Jan Beulich
- Re: [Xen-devel] rdtscP and xen (and maybe the app-tsc answer I've been looking for), Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] rdtscP and xen (and maybe the app-tsc answer I've been looking for), Jan Beulich
- Re: [Xen-devel] rdtscP and xen (and maybe the app-tsc answer I've been looking for), Jeremy Fitzhardinge
RE: [Xen-devel] rdtscP and xen (and maybe the app-tsc answer I've been looking for), Jan Beulich
|
|
|
|
|