xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Xen: Hybrid extension patchset for hypervisor
To: |
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Xen: Hybrid extension patchset for hypervisor |
From: |
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:22:15 -0700 |
Cc: |
"Yang, Sheng" <sheng.yang@xxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@xxxxxxxxx> |
Delivery-date: |
Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:22:43 -0700 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<1253135571.3896.4873.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
References: |
<C6D66994.14D6A%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C6D6AEEA.14EBF%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <0B53E02A2965CE4F9ADB38B34501A3A1940C78A8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4AB12C1F.9080502@xxxxxxxx> <1253135571.3896.4873.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.1) Gecko/20090814 Fedora/3.0-2.6.b3.fc11 Lightning/1.0pre Thunderbird/3.0b3 |
On 09/16/09 14:12, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>> Based on our data, what we would want in PV 64-bit guests are,
>>> fundamentally:
>>> - have the kernel run in ring 0 (so that it can regain the performance
>>> enhancements)
>>>
>>>
>> That's no problem. PV kernels don't currently assume they're running in
>> any particular ring, so they'd be happy to run in ring 0 if that's how
>> they're started (if there are problems, I'd consider that a bug). We
>> could then check for ring 0 and enable syscall/sysenter.
>>
> XENFEAT_supervisor_mode_kernel is supposed to enable this behaviour,
> although it hasn't been actively used for several years and never in the
> pvops kernel so you can bet it has bit-rotted...
>
That tends to have a slightly different meaning, viz "dom0 really *is*
privileged and can do anything it feels like". It isn't necessary to
have a specific feature/mechanism for "kernel happens to be in ring 0";
it can look at its own cs ring number.
>> We could do that with minimal API/ABI changes by:
>>
>> * Providing an identity p2m table
>> * Changing the hypercall page to make pte writes simple memory
>> writes (no hypercalls); xen would still keep track of pinned pages
>> and trap'n'emulate on them for back-compatibility (but fast-path
>> with no validation). We could expose the presence of HAP via
>> xen_features so that guests know they can avoid marking pagetables
>> RO, etc.
>> * Similarly, cr3 changes can be fast-pathed within the hypercall page.
>> * Whatever else I've overlooked.
>>
> Some combination of XENFEAT_writable_page_tables
> XENFEAT_writable_descriptor_tables and XENFEAT_auto_translated_physmap
> might be of interest for this bit.
Making use of XENFEAT_auto_translated_physmap would avoid the need for
identity p2m/m2p tables, but I'm not sure whether it still works. I got
close to completely removing all references to it at one point, but I
think ia64 uses it?
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] Xen: Hybrid extension patchset for hypervisor, Yang, Sheng
- [Xen-devel] Re: Xen: Hybrid extension patchset for hypervisor, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] Re: Xen: Hybrid extension patchset for hypervisor, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] RE: Xen: Hybrid extension patchset for hypervisor, Nakajima, Jun
- [Xen-devel] Re: Xen: Hybrid extension patchset for hypervisor, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Xen: Hybrid extension patchset for hypervisor, Ian Campbell
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Xen: Hybrid extension patchset for hypervisor,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Xen: Hybrid extension patchset for hypervisor, Ian Campbell
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: Xen: Hybrid extension patchset for hypervisor, Nakajima, Jun
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Xen: Hybrid extension patchset for hypervisor, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: Xen: Hybrid extension patchset for hypervisor, Nakajima, Jun
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Xen: Hybrid extension patchset for hypervisor, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Xen: Hybrid extension patchset for hypervisor, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Xen: Hybrid extension patchset for hypervisor, Frank van der Linden
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Xen: Hybrid extension patchset for hypervisor, Yang, Sheng
|
|
|