WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: prevent dom0 to use VT-d HW

To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, "Han, Weidong" <weidong.han@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: prevent dom0 to use VT-d HW
From: "Kay, Allen M" <allen.m.kay@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 15:35:16 -0700
Accept-language: en-US
Acceptlanguage: en-US
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 15:35:35 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4AA82CE8.1040106@xxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <715D42877B251141A38726ABF5CABF2C054B5B4A8A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4AA82CE8.1040106@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcoxnWSSy2iWRPDTSsibU78Qm3b7+AAADldw
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: prevent dom0 to use VT-d HW
The patch is for xen source tree, not pv-ops tree.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge [mailto:jeremy@xxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 3:32 PM
To: Han, Weidong
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Kay, Allen M; 'Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: prevent dom0 to use VT-d HW

On 09/07/09 19:24, Han, Weidong wrote:
> pv-ops dom0 contains Linux upstream VT-d driver, and will go to enable it 
> when VT-d is set in kernel config file. It should not enable VT-d in dom0.
>
> Currently it already zaps ACPI DMAR signature to prevents dom0 using VT-d HW 
> when VT-d is enabled for Xen. But when VT-d is not enabled for Xen, and VT-d 
> is set in pv-ops kernel config file, pv-ops dom0 will go to enable it. This 
> will results in pv-ops dom0 booting failure. This patch prevents dom0 to use 
> VT-d HW whether VT-d is enabled or disabled for Xen. 
>   

Which tree is this against?  My dom0 tree doesn't have
drivers/passthrough/vtd/.  Is there a branch you'd like me to pull in?

Thanks,
    J

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel