WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Biweekly VMX status report. Xen: #20125 & Xen0: #16529..

To: "Zhang, Xiantao" <xiantao.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>, "'xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Biweekly VMX status report. Xen: #20125 & Xen0: #16529...
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 09:32:00 +0100
Cc: "Xu, Dongxiao" <dongxiao.xu@xxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 01:32:32 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <706158FABBBA044BAD4FE898A02E4BC201C4351472@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: Acop/pvjdoIOZ7H5Tlmw1n9CMCMRdgABWuFAAAResGU=
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] Biweekly VMX status report. Xen: #20125 & Xen0: #16529...
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.20.0.090605
Thanks for tracking it down. I will take a look at the code myself and make
a decision.

 -- Keir

On 31/08/2009 07:46, "Zhang, Xiantao" <xiantao.zhang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Keir, 
>    For the bug 1500, it should be introduced by #Cset 20084. In vlapic_ipi,
> the variable dest_mode is casted to uint8_t from int when call
> vlapic_match_dest, but dest_mode field is the 11th bit in icr_low register.
> Therefore, when call vlapic_match_dest, dest_mode fields is always 0 due to
> the typecast, so when guest processors generate IPIs with logical destination
> mode, the target processors can't receive them because of wrong destination
> mode.  Dongxiao had a simple fix for that, but from the long run, we may need
> to cleanup the related logic and removed the misleading variables in the
> corresponding functions. What's your opinion ?
> Xiantao
> 
> 
> Xu, Jiajun wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> This is our bi-weekly test report for Xen-unstable tree. There are 8
>> new bugs found this two weeks, including 3 P1 bugs. SR-IOV can not
>> work in pv-ops Dom0. PAE guest is found can not boot with 4 vcpus.
>> And some platform is found fail to do Dom0 S3 with pv-ops.
>> 
>> New Bugs (8):
>> =====================================================================
>> 1. VF can not be enabled in pv-ops dom0
>> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1499
>> 2. Pae smp guest boot up hang at "Brought up 4 CPUS".
>> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1500
>> 3. Dom0 S3 will cause system reboot on Xeon 5400
>> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1501
>> 4. [VT-d] Winxp guest does not recognize the hot-add NIC on Nehalem-EP
>> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1498
>> 5. [vt-d]Guest print repeated characters using assigned USB keyboard
>> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1502
>> 6. [vt-d]the assigned USB device does not work when hot-plug the real
>> device 
>> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1503
>> 7. [vt-d]USB mouse/keyboard device has poor performance in guest
>> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1504
>> 8. [vt-d]USB EHCI can not be assign to guest
>> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1505
>> 
>> 
>> Old P1 Bugs (3):
>> =====================================================================
>> 1. stubdom based guest hangs at starting when using qcow image.
>> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1372
>> 2. Linux guest boots up very slow with SDL rendering
>> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1478
>> 3. [vt-d]when assign 82557 NIC to HVM, HVM hang
>> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1493
>> 
>> Old P2 Bugs (8)
>> =====================================================================
>> 1. Live migration clobbers VM filesystem
>> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1494
>> 2. T state control failed
>> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1451
>> 3. Failed to install FC10
>> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1461
>> 4. Two onboard 82576 NICs assigned to HVM guest cannot work stable if
>> use INTx interrupt.
>> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1459
>> 5. E1000e NIC failed in FC10 guest
>> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1458
>> 6. stubdom based guest hangs when assigning hdc to it.
>> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1373
>> 7. [stubdom]The xm save command hangs while saving <Domain-dm>.
>> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1377
>> 8. [stubdom] cannot restore stubdom based domain.
>> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1378
>> 
>> 
>> Xen Info:
>> ============================================================================
>>  xen-changeset:   20125:ed672a604cc7
>> 
>>  pvops git:
>>  commit 16529fc075a95a84901842f7353ac906cd912bba
>>  Merge: 5d78a20... 3186c67...
>>  Author: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> 
>>  ioemu git:
>>  commit a83d119cfcc20bc7edb427992d6e31b3e99430be
>>  Author: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>  Date:   Mon Aug 10 18:02:56 2009 +0100
>> 
>> Test Environment:
>> ==========================================================================
>> Service OS : Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.1 (Tikanga)
>> Hardware : Stoakley
>> 
>>   32e             Summary Test Report of Last Session
>> =====================================================================
>>                    Total   Pass    Fail    NoResult   Crash
>> =====================================================================
>> vtd                         6       4       2         0        0
>> control_panel               14      10      4         0        0
>> ras                         1       1       0         0        0
>> gtest                       22      16      6         0        0
>> =====================================================================
>> vtd                         6       4       2         0        0
>>  :one_pcie_up_nomsi_64_g3   1       1       0         0        0
>>  :two_dev_up_xp_nomsi_64_   1       0       1         0        0
>>  :one_pcie_up_vista_nomsi   1       0       1         0        0
>>  :lm_pcie_up_64_g32e        1       1       0         0        0
>>  :hp_pcie_up_nomsi_64_g32   1       1       0         0        0
>>  :lm_pcie_up_xp_nomsi_64_   1       1       0         0        0
>> control_panel               14      10      4         0        0
>>  :XEN_1500M_guest_64_g32e   1       1       0         0        0
>>  :XEN_256M_guest_64_gPAE    1       1       0         0        0
>>  :XEN_256M_xenu_64_gPAE     1       1       0         0        0
>>  :XEN_LM_Continuity_64_g3   1       1       0         0        0
>>  :XEN_LM_SMP_64_g32e        1       1       0         0        0
>>  :XEN_Nevada_xenu_64_g32e   1       0       1         0        0
>>  :XEN_vmx_vcpu_pin_64_g32   1       1       0         0        0
>>  :XEN_linux_win_64_g32e     1       0       1         0        0
>>  :XEN_SR_Continuity_64_g3   1       1       0         0        0
>>  :XEN_vmx_2vcpu_64_g32e     1       1       0         0        0
>>  :XEN_1500M_guest_64_gPAE   1       1       0         0        0
>>  :XEN_two_winxp_64_g32e     1       0       1         0        0
>>  :XEN_256M_guest_64_g32e    1       1       0         0        0
>>  :XEN_SR_SMP_64_g32e        1       0       1         0        0
>> ras                         1       1       0         0        0
>>  :cpu_online_offline_64_g   1       1       0         0        0
>> gtest                       22      16      6         0        0
>>  :boot_up_noacpi_win2k_64   1       1       0         0        0
>>  :boot_up_acpi_win2k_64_g   1       1       0         0        0
>>  :reboot_xp_64_g32e         1       1       0         0        0
>>  :boot_solaris10u5_64_g32   1       1       0         0        0
>>  :boot_up_vista_64_g32e     1       1       0         0        0
>>  :boot_indiana_64_g32e      1       1       0         0        0
>>  :boot_up_acpi_xp_64_g32e   1       1       0         0        0
>>  :boot_smp_acpi_xp_64_g32   1       0       1         0        0
>>  :boot_up_acpi_64_g32e      1       1       0         0        0
>>  :boot_up_win2008_64_g32e   1       1       0         0        0
>>  :boot_base_kernel_64_g32   1       1       0         0        0
>>  :boot_up_acpi_win2k3_64_   1       1       0         0        0
>>  :kb_nightly_64_g32e        1       1       0         0        0
>>  :boot_nevada_64_g32e       1       1       0         0        0
>>  :ltp_nightly_64_g32e       1       0       1         0        0
>>  :boot_fc9_64_g32e          1       0       1         0        0
>>  :boot_smp_vista_64_g32e    1       0       1         0        0
>>  :boot_smp_win2008_64_g32   1       0       1         0        0
>>  :boot_smp_acpi_win2k3_64   1       1       0         0        0
>>  :boot_rhel5u1_64_g32e      1       1       0         0        0
>>  :boot_smp_acpi_win2k_64_   1       0       1         0        0
>>  :reboot_fc6_64_g32e        1       1       0         0        0
>> =====================================================================
>> Total                       43      31      12        0        0
>> 
>> 
>>    pae           Summary Test Report of Last Session
>> =====================================================================
>>                    Total   Pass    Fail    NoResult   Crash
>> =====================================================================
>> vtd                         5       3       2         0        0
>> control_panel               10      7       3         0        0
>> ras                         1       1       0         0        0
>> gtest                       24      17      7         0        0
>> =====================================================================
>> vtd                         5       3       2         0        0
>>  :two_dev_up_xp_nomsi_PAE   1       0       1         0        0
>>  :hp_pcie_up_nomsi_PAE_gP   1       1       0         0        0
>>  :one_pcie_up_nomsi_PAE_g   1       1       0         0        0
>>  :one_pcie_up_vista_nomsi   1       0       1         0        0
>>  :lm_pcie_up_PAE_gPAE       1       1       0         0        0
>> control_panel               10      7       3         0        0
>>  :XEN_linux_win_PAE_gPAE    1       1       0         0        0
>>  :XEN_SR_SMP_PAE_gPAE       1       0       1         0        0
>>  :XEN_LM_SMP_PAE_gPAE       1       0       1         0        0
>>  :XEN_SR_Continuity_PAE_g   1       1       0         0        0
>>  :XEN_vmx_vcpu_pin_PAE_gP   1       1       0         0        0
>>  :XEN_LM_Continuity_PAE_g   1       1       0         0        0
>>  :XEN_256M_guest_PAE_gPAE   1       1       0         0        0
>>  :XEN_two_winxp_PAE_gPAE    1       1       0         0        0
>>  :XEN_1500M_guest_PAE_gPA   1       1       0         0        0
>>  :XEN_vmx_2vcpu_PAE_gPAE    1       0       1         0        0
>> ras                         1       1       0         0        0
>>  :cpu_online_offline_PAE_   1       1       0         0        0
>> gtest                       24      17      7         0        0
>>  :ltp_nightly_PAE_gPAE      1       0       1         0        0
>>  :boot_up_acpi_PAE_gPAE     1       1       0         0        0
>>  :reboot_xp_PAE_gPAE        1       1       0         0        0
>>  :boot_up_acpi_xp_PAE_gPA   1       1       0         0        0
>>  :boot_up_vista_PAE_gPAE    1       1       0         0        0
>>  :boot_fc9_PAE_gPAE         1       0       1         0        0
>>  :boot_up_acpi_win2k3_PAE   1       1       0         0        0
>>  :boot_smp_acpi_win2k3_PA   1       0       1         0        0
>>  :boot_smp_acpi_win2k_PAE   1       0       1         0        0
>>  :boot_up_acpi_win2k_PAE_   1       1       0         0        0
>>  :boot_smp_acpi_xp_PAE_gP   1       0       1         0        0
>>  :boot_up_noacpi_win2k_PA   1       1       0         0        0
>>  :boot_smp_vista_PAE_gPAE   1       0       1         0        0
>>  :boot_up_noacpi_win2k3_P   1       1       0         0        0
>>  :boot_nevada_PAE_gPAE      1       1       0         0        0
>>  :boot_rhel5u1_PAE_gPAE     1       1       0         0        0
>>  :boot_indiana_PAE_gPAE     1       1       0         0        0
>>  :boot_solaris10u5_PAE_gP   1       1       0         0        0
>>  :boot_base_kernel_PAE_gP   1       1       0         0        0
>>  :boot_up_win2008_PAE_gPA   1       1       0         0        0
>>  :boot_up_noacpi_xp_PAE_g   1       1       0         0        0
>>  :boot_smp_win2008_PAE_gP   1       0       1         0        0
>>  :reboot_fc6_PAE_gPAE       1       1       0         0        0
>>  :kb_nightly_PAE_gPAE       1       1       0         0        0
>> =====================================================================
>> Total                       40      28      12        0        0
>> 
>> 
>> Best Regards,
>> Jiajun
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> 



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel