|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] XCI: can we get to the demo state?
 
Phung Te Ha wrote:
 
Hi Vincent,
I tried your suggestion, adding pci = 0,bind,0000:00:02.0 in the config
on 2 different machines, the HP6930 and on an Intel MB DQ35OJ.
 On both machines, I got the samething, the guest run as shown by 
xenops list_domains:
 id |  state |    cpu_time |                                 uuid
 0 |     R  | 54203470658 | 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
 1 |    B H | 12214238864 | 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000002
But nothing shows on the screen.
I checked the logs and found in xenops dmesg:
...
(XEN) Intel VT-d Snoop Control not supported.
(XEN) Intel VT-d DMA Passthrough not supported.
(XEN) Intel VT-d Queued Invalidation not supported.
(XEN) Intel VT-d Interrupt Remapping not supported.
(XEN) I/O virtualisation enabled
(XEN) I/O virtualisation for PV guests disabled
And when the guest is started:
...
  _fault:DMA Write: 0:2.0 addr faddf7000 REASON 5 iommu->reg = 
ffff828bfff56000
(XEN) print_vtd_entries: iommu = ffff83007dcfb320 bdf = 0:2:0 gmfn = 
faddf7
(XEN)     root_entry = ffff83007e0ce000
(XEN)     root_entry[0] = 7e066001
(XEN)     context = ffff83007e066000
(XEN)     context[10] = 201_7da02001
(XEN)     l3 = ffff83007da02000
(XEN)     l3_index = 3e
(XEN)     l3[3e] = 0
(XEN)     l3[3e] not present
(XEN) [VT-D]iommu.c:722: iommu_page_fault: iommu->reg = ffff828bfff56000
(XEN) [VT-D]iommu.c:691: iommu_fault_status: Fault Overflow
(XEN) [VT-D]iommu.c:694: iommu_fault_status: Primary Pending Fault
 (XEN) [VT-D]iommu.c:676: iommu_fault:DMA Write: 0:2.0 addr faddf7000 
REASON 5 iommu->reg = ffff828bfff56000
(XEN) print_vtd_entries: iommu = ffff83007dcfb320 bdf = 0:2:0 gmfn = 
faddf7
(XEN)     root_entry = ffff83007e0ce000
(XEN)     root_entry[0] = 7e066001
(XEN)     context = ffff83007e066000
...
 Do you think these 2 machines have enough of VT-d features to get the 
graphics passed-through?
Do you have a preferred desktop board, known to work for graphisc 
passed-through?
 I'm not really familiar with thoses VT-d errors. Kamala/Ross do you have 
any idea, what this previous errors means ?
thanks,
--
Vincent
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- [Xen-devel] XCI: can we get to the demo state?, Phung Te Ha
- Re: [Xen-devel] XCI: can we get to the demo state?, Vincent Hanquez
- RE: [Xen-devel] XCI: can we get to the demo state?, Tim Moore
- Re: [Xen-devel] XCI: can we get to the demo state?, Vincent Hanquez
 - Re: [Xen-devel] XCI: can we get to the demo state?, Phung Te Ha
 - Re: [Xen-devel] XCI: can we get to the demo state?,
Vincent Hanquez <=
 - RE: [Xen-devel] XCI: can we get to the demo state?, Ross Philipson
 - Re: [Xen-devel] XCI: can we get to the demo state?, Phung Te Ha
 - RE: [Xen-devel] XCI: can we get to the demo state?, Ross Philipson
 - Re: [Xen-devel] XCI: can we get to the demo state?, Phung Te Ha
 - RE: [Xen-devel] XCI: can we get to the demo state?, Ross Philipson
 - Re: [Xen-devel] XCI: can we get to the demo state?, Tom Rotenberg
 - Re: [Xen-devel] XCI: can we get to the demo state?, Phung Te Ha
 
  
- Re: [Xen-devel] XCI: can we get to the demo state?, Phung Te Ha
 
- Re: [Xen-devel] XCI: can we get to the demo state?, Phung Te Ha
 - Re: [Xen-devel] XCI: can we get to the demo state?, Phung Te Ha
 
  
  
 
 |  
  
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |