Re: [Xen-devel] New release candidate for 3.4.1

To:	John Levon <levon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] New release candidate for 3.4.1
From:	Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:06:03 +0100
Cc:	"xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date:	Wed, 29 Jul 2009 06:06:36 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20090729124905.GB27708@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	AcoQSvhru8EFkcmbSL+ZyYN1ej3JLwAAlrqZ
Thread-topic:	[Xen-devel] New release candidate for 3.4.1
User-agent:	Microsoft-Entourage/12.20.0.090605

On 29/07/2009 13:49, "John Levon" <levon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 03:38:48AM -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote:
> 
>> I believe backport CS 19889 libfsimage: Support for zfs version 16 makes
>> sense.
>> SNV_117 already utilize ZFS v.16 for it's image.
> 
> Agreed. It's not a regression as such but it does make recent Solaris
> unusable on Linux. It's also very self-contained (can only break ZFS)

I'll add that into just 3.4 branch without a new rc tag. Sound okay?

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] New release candidate for 3.4.1