xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: TSC scaling and softtsc reprise, and PROPOSAL
To: |
Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Xen-Devel (E-mail)" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
[Xen-devel] Re: TSC scaling and softtsc reprise, and PROPOSAL |
From: |
Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Mon, 20 Jul 2009 18:14:46 +0100 |
Cc: |
Ian Pratt <Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx>, "Zhang, Xiantao" <xiantao.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>, John Levon <levon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Delivery-date: |
Mon, 20 Jul 2009 10:16:05 -0700 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<c3ee7f5f-1a04-43bb-9eef-c85a1bb80aef@default> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Thread-index: |
AcoJXFBhvSSGKQp1Rza0iAmHydvqHAAAUQLp |
Thread-topic: |
TSC scaling and softtsc reprise, and PROPOSAL |
User-agent: |
Microsoft-Entourage/12.19.0.090515 |
On 20/07/2009 18:05, "Dan Magenheimer" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The default mode for all xen systems should be that all rdtsc
> instructions should be emulated by xen using xen system time
> as the timestamp counter (i.e. nanosecond frequency).
>
> The no-softtsc Xen boot option remains available to force the
> non-trapping mechanism if desired. It might make sense to
> add a per-guest config option to override per guest.
>
> The Xen CPU info emulation should reflect that tsc is constant
> and safe to use on an SMP.
>
> Comments? I think someone at Intel (Eddie?) was studying the
> TSC emulation path to see if it could be faster, but I'm not
> sure where that ended up.
Defaults which slow things down are never popular. The slowdown on a
non-idle Solaris guest, for example, could be significant. It is a
correctness/accuracy vs performance tradeoff though. But I don't think there
are many real-world complaints about the TSC accuracy now -- I think the
default is set appropriately.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] TSC scaling and softtsc reprise, and PROPOSAL, Dan Magenheimer
- [Xen-devel] Re: TSC scaling and softtsc reprise, and PROPOSAL,
Keir Fraser <=
- [Xen-devel] RE: TSC scaling and softtsc reprise, and PROPOSAL, Dan Magenheimer
- [Xen-devel] Re: TSC scaling and softtsc reprise, and PROPOSAL, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] RE: TSC scaling and softtsc reprise, and PROPOSAL, Dan Magenheimer
- [Xen-devel] RE: TSC scaling and softtsc reprise, and PROPOSAL, Zhang, Xiantao
- [Xen-devel] RE: TSC scaling and softtsc reprise, and PROPOSAL, Dan Magenheimer
- [Xen-devel] RE: TSC scaling and softtsc reprise, and PROPOSAL, Ian Pratt
- [Xen-devel] RE: TSC scaling and softtsc reprise, and PROPOSAL, Dan Magenheimer
- [Xen-devel] Re: TSC scaling and softtsc reprise, and PROPOSAL, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] RE: TSC scaling and softtsc reprise, and PROPOSAL, Dan Magenheimer
- [Xen-devel] Re: TSC scaling and softtsc reprise, and PROPOSAL, Keir Fraser
|
|
|