| 
         
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: TSC scaling and softtsc reprise, and PROPOSAL
 
| 
To:  | 
Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>,	"Xen-Devel (E-mail)" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Subject:  | 
[Xen-devel] Re: TSC scaling and softtsc reprise, and PROPOSAL | 
 
| 
From:  | 
Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Date:  | 
Mon, 20 Jul 2009 18:14:46 +0100 | 
 
| 
Cc:  | 
Ian Pratt <Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx>,	"Zhang, Xiantao" <xiantao.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>,	John Levon <levon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Delivery-date:  | 
Mon, 20 Jul 2009 10:16:05 -0700 | 
 
| 
Envelope-to:  | 
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | 
 
| 
In-reply-to:  | 
<c3ee7f5f-1a04-43bb-9eef-c85a1bb80aef@default> | 
 
| 
List-help:  | 
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> | 
 
| 
List-id:  | 
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> | 
 
| 
List-post:  | 
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> | 
 
| 
List-subscribe:  | 
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> | 
 
| 
List-unsubscribe:  | 
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> | 
 
| 
Sender:  | 
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | 
 
| 
Thread-index:  | 
AcoJXFBhvSSGKQp1Rza0iAmHydvqHAAAUQLp | 
 
| 
Thread-topic:  | 
TSC scaling and softtsc reprise, and PROPOSAL | 
 
| 
User-agent:  | 
Microsoft-Entourage/12.19.0.090515 | 
 
 
 
On 20/07/2009 18:05, "Dan Magenheimer" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The default mode for all xen systems should be that all rdtsc
> instructions should be emulated by xen using xen system time
> as the timestamp counter (i.e. nanosecond frequency).
> 
> The no-softtsc Xen boot option remains available to force the
> non-trapping mechanism if desired.  It might make sense to
> add a per-guest config option to override per guest.
> 
> The Xen CPU info emulation should reflect that tsc is constant
> and safe to use on an SMP.
> 
> Comments?  I think someone at Intel (Eddie?) was studying the
> TSC emulation path to see if it could be faster, but I'm not
> sure where that ended up.
Defaults which slow things down are never popular. The slowdown on a
non-idle Solaris guest, for example, could be significant. It is a
correctness/accuracy vs performance tradeoff though. But I don't think there
are many real-world complaints about the TSC accuracy now -- I think the
default is set appropriately.
 -- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- [Xen-devel] TSC scaling and softtsc reprise, and PROPOSAL, Dan Magenheimer
- [Xen-devel] Re: TSC scaling and softtsc reprise, and PROPOSAL,
Keir Fraser <=
- [Xen-devel] RE: TSC scaling and softtsc reprise, and PROPOSAL, Dan Magenheimer
- [Xen-devel] Re: TSC scaling and softtsc reprise, and PROPOSAL, Keir Fraser
 - [Xen-devel] RE: TSC scaling and softtsc reprise, and PROPOSAL, Dan Magenheimer
 
- [Xen-devel] RE: TSC scaling and softtsc reprise, and PROPOSAL, Zhang, Xiantao
 - [Xen-devel] RE: TSC scaling and softtsc reprise, and PROPOSAL, Dan Magenheimer
 - [Xen-devel] RE: TSC scaling and softtsc reprise, and PROPOSAL, Ian Pratt
 - [Xen-devel] RE: TSC scaling and softtsc reprise, and PROPOSAL, Dan Magenheimer
 - [Xen-devel] Re: TSC scaling and softtsc reprise, and PROPOSAL, Keir Fraser
 - [Xen-devel] RE: TSC scaling and softtsc reprise, and PROPOSAL, Dan Magenheimer
 - [Xen-devel] Re: TSC scaling and softtsc reprise, and PROPOSAL, Keir Fraser
 
  
  
  
 
 |  
  
 | 
    |