Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86-64: reduce symbol table size

>>> Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 13.07.09 13:09 >>>
>On 13/07/2009 11:51, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>>>> Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 13.07.09 12:28 >>>
>>> This doesn't build for me. Build host is Debian Etch running gcc 4.1.2 and
>>> binutils 2.17. Error snippet is attached -- it complains like this for every
>>> PTR line in .xen-syms.0.S.
>> 
>> Hmm, odd: I'm using binutils 2.16.91.<something> (gcc is 4.1.2 for me too).
>> Could you attach your .xen-syms.0.S plus (ideally) also the pre-processed
>> .xen-syms.0.s? (The warning and error at the end of your output also look
>> bogus, as much as does them all getting reported against the same line.)
>
>Attached. Silly suffix names are because MacOS doesn't seem to have
>case-sensitive filename suffixes.

That makes it obvious: I have another local patch that abstracts the ...<<30
operations in config.h to be asm-compatible, and thus things built fine for me.
I'll send an updated patch as soon as I sorted out which bits need moving over.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

[Xen-devel] Read domU filesystem, OK

Next by Date:

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] (Take 2): transcendent memory ("tmem") for Linux, Avi Kivity

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86-64: reduce symbol table size, Jan Beulich

Next by Thread:

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/5] move various NR_CPUS dimensioned arrays into per-CPU data, Jan Beulich

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]