|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] dom0 hang
To: |
"Yu, Ke" <ke.yu@xxxxxxxxx>, "mukesh.rathor@xxxxxxxxxx" <mukesh.rathor@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
Re: [Xen-devel] dom0 hang |
From: |
Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Tue, 07 Jul 2009 08:24:55 +0100 |
Cc: |
George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Kurt C. Hackel" <kurt.hackel@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Delivery-date: |
Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:25:27 -0700 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<4D05DB80B95B23498C72C700BD6C2E0B2F9F62EC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Thread-index: |
Acn+tZ24wQgV+EHPRx6jFo5ZCiRy2QAFY0twAAI23qA= |
Thread-topic: |
[Xen-devel] dom0 hang |
User-agent: |
Microsoft-Entourage/12.19.0.090515 |
On 07/07/2009 08:14, "Yu, Ke" <ke.yu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> BTW, why can't the tick be suspended when csched_schedule() concludes
>> it's idle vcpu before returning? won't that would make it less intrusive.
>
> The tick suspend can be put in csched_schedule, but the suspend/resume logic
> is still needed in acpi_processor_idle anyway, due to another dbs_timer
> suspend/resume. The intention here is to make acpi_processor_idle the central
> place for timers which are stoppable during idle period. If there is other
> stoppable timer in the future, it can be easily added to acpi_processor_idle.
> So it is clean to keep current logic. and as long as we carefully not over
> doing the softirq, it looks not so intrusive. How do you think?
I think the approach is fine. I also already applied your patch since it is
obviously a good bug fix, even if it doesn't fix Mukesh's bug. And I fixed
the comment at the same time. And I backported it for Xen 3.4.1.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] dom0 hang, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] dom0 hang, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] dom0 hang, George Dunlap
- Re: [Xen-devel] dom0 hang, Mukesh Rathor
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [Xen-devel] dom0 hang, George Dunlap
- Re: [Xen-devel] dom0 hang, Mukesh Rathor
- Re: [Xen-devel] dom0 hang, Mukesh Rathor
- RE: [Xen-devel] dom0 hang, Yu, Ke
- RE: [Xen-devel] dom0 hang, Yu, Ke
- Re: [Xen-devel] dom0 hang, Mukesh Rathor
- RE: [Xen-devel] dom0 hang, Yu, Ke
- Re: [Xen-devel] dom0 hang,
Keir Fraser <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] dom0 hang, Mukesh Rathor
|
|
|
|
|