WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.30 dom0 Xen patches

To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.30 dom0 Xen patches
From: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 14:02:01 +0300
Cc: Andrew Lyon <andrew.lyon@xxxxxxxxx>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:02:35 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4A4C75750200007800008864@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <f4527be0907011015m28e29ccelba4afcf8ec8fe31f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A4C75750200007800008864@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 07:53:09AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> Andrew Lyon <andrew.lyon@xxxxxxxxx> 01.07.09 19:15 >>>
> >I have rebased the xen-patches from opensuse
> >kernel-source-2.6.30-50.1.src.rpm so that they can be applied to
> >vanilla 2.6.30, the usual patches tarball and gentoo ebuild are
> >available at http://code.google.com/p/gentoo-xen-kernel/downloads/list 
> >, if you are not using Gentoo simply apply the patches in numeric
> >order.
> >
> >Some notes:
> >
> >both dom0 and domU require CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ=y and CONFIG_HOTPLUG=y
> >64 bit dom0/domU requires CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION=y
> 
> May I ask why you found the first and third ones to be necessary? Unless
> it's because of the conditional in the loop right after the commen "Zap
> stats across IRQ changes of use." in unbind_from_irq(), which I fixed a
> few days ago, but didn't push out to our internal repo so far. (The fix
> is to change the dependency from CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ to
> CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS in the 2.6.30 patch.)
> 
> The second one seems less meaningful, as I wouldn't think anyone would
> build a general use (Xen) kernel with EMBEDDED=y, and HOTPLUG is not
> user selectable without EMBEDDED.
> 
> May I also ask for you to let us know about fixes to the patches that you
> find necessary which aren't just due to you applying them to plain 2.6.30?
> 

Hello Jan,

I assume Novell did a lot of testing/patching/bugfixing for SLES11 2.6.27
Xen kernel. Do these OpenSUSE Xen patches contain the fixes from SLES11? 

-- Pasi

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel