WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] passthrough: deliver IRQs even if bsp is hal

To: 'Kouya Shimura' <kouya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] passthrough: deliver IRQs even if bsp is halted (support kexec/kdump on hvm)
From: "Han, Weidong" <weidong.han@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:02:13 +0800
Accept-language: en-US
Acceptlanguage: en-US
Cc: 'Keir Fraser' <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 02:04:02 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <715D42877B251141A38726ABF5CABF2C054570DED3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <7kr5x2nrcd.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <7kocs6nr8x.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <715D42877B251141A38726ABF5CABF2C054570DED3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: Acn5UK51qOkNZfjiT6a91g6dbcuGeQAD1zmwAABMhWA=
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] passthrough: deliver IRQs even if bsp is halted (support kexec/kdump on hvm)
Han, Weidong wrote:
> Kouya Shimura wrote:
>> This patch is needed for kexec/kdump on hvm since kdump halts bsp.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Kouya Shimura <kouya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> It kicks every online vcpu. The result will be more unnecessary IPIs,
> especially the vcpu# is big. Therefore increase cost of interrupt
> handling of assigned devices.  
> 

Sorry, I misunderstood your patch. It only kicks one online vcpu. It is no 
problem.

Regards,
Weidong

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel