[Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: don't disable VT-d engine in suspend f

To:	'Keir Fraser' <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	[Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: don't disable VT-d engine in suspend for security purpose
From:	"Han, Weidong" <weidong.han@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:31:50 +0800
Accept-language:	en-US
Acceptlanguage:	en-US
Cc:	"'xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date:	Tue, 23 Jun 2009 23:33:03 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	Acn0lXTjJ1bH2S3yTI6V1R3fsxOiAg==
Thread-topic:	[Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: don't disable VT-d engine in suspend for security purpose

force_iommu option is used to force enabling and using IOMMU for security 
purpose. So when force_iommu is set, it shouldn't disable VT-d engines in 
suspend.

Signed-off-by: Weidong Han <weidong.han@xxxxxxxxx>

s3.patch
Description: s3.patch

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: don't disable VT-d engine in suspend for secur