Hi, Kamala,
Thank you for the information.
I didn't apply the patch, and I don't have any intention to apply the
patch for this issue.
GK
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Kamala
Narasimhan<Kamala.Narasimhan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The xen-acpi-wmi patch in XenClient linux 2.6.27 patch queue is tied to
> XenClient. I didn't expect this patch to be used outside the scope of
> XenClient which is why you encounter the below issues.
>
> Could you please momentarily exclude the patch before pushing the rest or
> revert it if already applied and then build that branch? Going forward, I
> will create a XenClient flavor of wmi.c that won't step on the base wmi
> implementation and configure the two to be mutually exclusive.
>
> Kamala
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xen-devel-
>> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Genki Kuroda
>> Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 7:06 PM
>> To: Boris Derzhavets
>> Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Future of xenbits Linux trees
>>
>> Hello, Boris,
>>
>> I had the same error, but I was able to compile after commenting out
>> the "HACK ALERT" section in /drivers/acpi/ec.c
>> More information seems to be in wmi.c.
>>
>> Who is taking care of this kind of issue? This is my first post...
>>
>> Here is the patch to show where I commented out.
>>
>> diff –git a/drivers/acpi/ec.c b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
>> index 2359480..b2c0221 100644
>> — a/drivers/acpi/ec.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
>> @@ -387,6 +387,7 @@ static int acpi_ec_read(struct acpi_ec *ec, u8
>> address, u8 * data)
>> /* HACK ALERT
>> * Please refer to wmi.c for an explanation on why we added this hack.
>> */
>> +/*
>> if ( in_query_wmi_event_data == TRUE ) {
>> if ( address == 0×2b ) {
>> wmi_event_data_index = 0;
>> @@ -398,6 +399,7 @@ static int acpi_ec_read(struct acpi_ec *ec, u8
>> address, u8 * data)
>> wmi_event_data_index++;
>> }
>> }
>> +*/
>>
>> return result;
>> }
>>
>>
>> --
>> Genki Kuroda
>> E-mail: genkikuroda@xxxxxxxxx
>> Website: http://mulps.wordpress.com/
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 12:53 AM, Boris
>> Derzhavets<bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Kernel: arch/x86/boot/vmlinuz is ready (#2)
>> > ERROR: "wmi_install_notify_handler" [drivers/misc/hp-wmi.ko]
>> undefined!
>> > ERROR: "wmi_remove_notify_handler" [drivers/misc/hp-wmi.ko]
>> undefined!
>> > ERROR: "wmi_has_guid" [drivers/misc/hp-wmi.ko] undefined!
>> > ERROR: "wmi_has_guid" [drivers/misc/acer-wmi.ko] undefined!
>> > WARNING: modpost: Found 3 section mismatch(es).
>> > To see full details build your kernel with:
>> > 'make CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y'
>> > make[1]: *** [__modpost] Error 1
>> > make: *** [modules] Error 2
>> >
>> > Boris.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Home