| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] hypercall_xlat_continuation()
On 27/05/2009 09:02, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> You know that all the 'xlat' stuff in Xen is for 32-bit guests running on
>>> 64-bit hypervisor, right? 64-bit dom0 would never execute this logic.
>>
>> Unless someone like me, in trying to make 32bit apps on 64bit dom0 work,
>> causes it to take compat path if it's 32bit hcall. Yeah, I know whacky :)...
>
> I don't think that's a good approach - even when dealing with 32-bit apps,
> it's a 64-bit kernel, and hence you should rather translate things to the
> 64-bit format in the kernel layer that sits in between (after all, apps can't
> do hypercalls directly).
Why would you do that when the tedious translation mechanism already exists
in the hypervisor?
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home