xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [GIT PULL] xen /proc/mtrr implementation
To: |
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [GIT PULL] xen /proc/mtrr implementation |
From: |
Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Tue, 19 May 2009 15:31:38 +0200 |
Cc: |
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Delivery-date: |
Tue, 19 May 2009 06:32:34 -0700 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<4A12B244.8070301@xxxxxxxxxx> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
References: |
<m1iqk1k708.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A10EAC4.9070701@xxxxxxxx> <20090518085902.GE10687@xxxxxxx> <4A11A3F8.1010202@xxxxxxxx> <20090519095918.GA11790@xxxxxxx> <4A12A46A02000078000017E1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090519110837.GA10548@xxxxxxx> <4A12A05C.6050004@xxxxxxxxxx> <20090519122623.GD14305@xxxxxxx> <4A12B244.8070301@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
* Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 05/19/09 14:26, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> * Gerd Hoffmann<kraxel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> On 05/19/09 13:08, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>>> Or, alternatively, the hypervisor can expose its own administrative
>>>> interface to manage MTRRs.
>>> Guess what? Xen does exactly that. And the xen mtrr_ops
>>> implementation uses that interface ...
>>
>> No, that is not an 'administrative interface' - that is a guest
>> kernel level hack that complicates Linux, extends its effective ABI
>> dependencies and which has to be maintained there from that point
>> on.
>>
>> There's really just three proper technical solutions here:
>>
>> - either catch the lowlevel CPU hw ops (the MSR modifications, which
>> isnt really all that different from the mtrr_ops approach so it
>> shouldnt pose undue difficulties to the Xen hypervisor).
>
> Devil is in the details.
>
> The dom0 kernel might not see all physical cpus on the system. So
> Xen can't leave the job of looping over all cpus to the dom0
> kernel, Xen has to apply the changes made by the (priviledged)
> guest kernel on any (virtual) cpu to all (physical) cpus in the
> machine.
Applying MTRR changes to only part of the CPUs is utter madness.
> Which in turn means the "lowlevel cpu hw op" would work in a
> slightly different way on Xen and native. Nasty.
>
>> That will
>> be maximally transparent and compatible, with zero changes needed
>> to the Linux kernel.
>
> No, the linux kernel probably should do the wrmsr on one cpu only then.
Why?
>> - or introduce its own hypercall API based administration API,
>> without bothering the guest kernel with crap. Trivially patch Xorg
>> to make use of it and that's it.
>
> I have serious doubts that this is going to fly with KMS.
>
> Oops, the third "proper technical solutions" is missing.
Yeah, the third one is to not touch MTRRs after bootup and use PAT.
Ingo
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] Re: [GIT PULL] xen /proc/mtrr implementation, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [GIT PULL] xen /proc/mtrr implementation, Gerd Hoffmann
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [GIT PULL] xen /proc/mtrr implementation,
Ingo Molnar <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [GIT PULL] xen /proc/mtrr implementation, Gerd Hoffmann
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [GIT PULL] xen /proc/mtrr implementation, Ingo Molnar
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [GIT PULL] xen /proc/mtrr implementation, Gerd Hoffmann
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [GIT PULL] xen /proc/mtrr implementation, Ingo Molnar
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [GIT PULL] xen /proc/mtrr implementation, Gerd Hoffmann
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [GIT PULL] xen /proc/mtrr implementation, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- [Xen-devel] Re: [GIT PULL] xen /proc/mtrr implementation, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- [Xen-devel] Re: [GIT PULL] xen /proc/mtrr implementation, Andi Kleen
- [Xen-devel] Re: [GIT PULL] xen /proc/mtrr implementation, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- [Xen-devel] Re: [GIT PULL] xen /proc/mtrr implementation, Andi Kleen
|
|
|