On 08/05/2009 22:53, "Ian Pratt" <
Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
Perhaps. However measuring cycles is important and, more
>>
specifically, measuring MAX cycles spent across a set of
>>
interrupts. As a result, I suspect any code that measures
>>
this (regardless of whether the result is reported by
>> xentrace
or debug-key) would likely encounter the
>> same objection from
Keir.
>
> I can't imagine there'd be any objection to adding
trace macros to record
> this. The xentrace log processing tool can
then be updated to generate max or
> histogram
values.
Yes, xentrace records would be okay. It's adding
another debug key and