xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: [GIT PULL] xen /proc/mtrr implementation
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
There are only 3 states that are interesting. WB UC and WC. Since
Xen controls the page tables anyway. I expect it can even remap
it feels like it.
It would be awkward. A paravirtualized guest has direct access to the
real pagetables, and so would notice if Xen swizzled around the PAT bits
when it reads back a pagetable entry. We don't currently have any
paravirtualized hooks for adjusting the PTE flags, because there hasn't
been any need, and it would probably be pretty costly (lots of
read+bit-tests would turn into a function call). On the other hand,
there's probably only a few places (if any) in the kernel which actually
inspect the PAT status of an established PTE, so we could put in some
special case mapping there. It becomes a maintenance burden to 1) track
down all the right places, and then 2) make sure any new instances get
handled properly. So, not a preferred solution, I think.
But our planned approach is to simply make Xen use the same PAT layout
as Linux, and go from there. We still need to sort out the details of
how to handle other Xen guests which use the existing Xen PAT setup, how
to verify that Xen and the guest kernel are really using the same setup,
etc.
But since we support the last few year's worth of released versions of
Xen, we still need to handle the PAT-not-supported case with reasonable
grace.
I won't argue that having MTRRs when you can makes sense. It is a bit
weird in a vitalized system.
It's not really virtualized. We're talking about dom0, which is the
guest domain which has access to the real machine's real hardware; the
MTRR is part of that.
At a practical level there are an
increasing number of systems for which MTRRs are unusable because the
BIOS sets up overlapping mtrrs. With cheap entry level systems
shipping with 4G I expect it is becoming a majority of systems.
Yes, but that is true irrespective of Xen.
J
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] Re: [GIT PULL] xen /proc/mtrr implementation, (continued)
- [Xen-devel] Re: [GIT PULL] xen /proc/mtrr implementation, Ingo Molnar
- [Xen-devel] Re: [GIT PULL] xen /proc/mtrr implementation, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- [Xen-devel] Re: [GIT PULL] xen /proc/mtrr implementation,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <=
- [Xen-devel] Re: [GIT PULL] xen /proc/mtrr implementation, Ingo Molnar
- [Xen-devel] Re: [GIT PULL] xen /proc/mtrr implementation, Jan Beulich
- [Xen-devel] Re: [GIT PULL] xen /proc/mtrr implementation, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- [Xen-devel] Re: [GIT PULL] xen /proc/mtrr implementation, Ingo Molnar
- [Xen-devel] Re: [GIT PULL] xen /proc/mtrr implementation, Jan Beulich
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [GIT PULL] xen /proc/mtrr implementation, Ingo Molnar
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [GIT PULL] xen /proc/mtrr implementation, Gerd Hoffmann
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [GIT PULL] xen /proc/mtrr implementation, Ingo Molnar
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [GIT PULL] xen /proc/mtrr implementation, Alan Cox
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [GIT PULL] xen /proc/mtrr implementation, Ingo Molnar
|
|
|