WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Is this a bug of xentrace?

To: Hui Kang <hkang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Is this a bug of xentrace?
From: George Dunlap <dunlapg@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 09:42:17 +0100
Cc: Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 11 May 2009 06:53:09 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=cQgNsVrO58KqfqZfAhkMQFBAvmpgMiK2SxAMH6yVvcw=; b=LhTzk7cECYs2DfyiPFh56pz6ef1kfC6IHMiljVzM3mUyzXKS2w7M+ThsyEBqoZBCuW T4BdJ1U6ShUZaDMa+lPixp3jHg83Gw3YG4N9Hr5jyAyER84cqYGhKS4lhsCnfea8X3dn qj7t+PTiJfqDZwSsJb0TOnQHTy+W83LrfIC6s=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=NAgq+OoML/jnuUlM8cQlC8tTBIB0wDnsrVEK+NYfI82xpH1fh7qQq1XnRFtmwZUm1x THQAw4U9N9ex+8XuotJt2fwmeVFiUTJ2JYyc5d6Hixnl+tqvjLtx4SOFlifo2Q4SoeMi jQNwA1ToYSGIiBi5FjEv0pFQnxM74nVMvdWHk=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4A05D1EF.2090405@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4A05D1EF.2090405@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Are you sure that's not 0x7fff? (Three f's, not four?)  0x7fff is the
domain ID of the idle domain (scheduled when there is no other work on
the system to do).

 -George

On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 7:56 PM, Hui Kang <hkang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
> I am using xentrace to trace the events of guest domains on a host physical
> machine.  In the parsed trace file,
> if the guest domain is created on the host machine, then the entry is good
> switch_infprev    [ old_domid = 0x00000002
> // the guest domain has a id of 2.
> switch_infnext    [ new_domid = 0x00000000
>
> However, if the guest domain is migrated from another host machine,  the
> parsed trace file shows
> switch_infprev    [ old_domid = 0x00007ffff
> // the guest domain has a id of 2.
> switch_infnext    [ new_domid = 0x00000000
> Even the domain Id is 2, it shows 0x00007ffff.
> Can anyone explain this? Thanks.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>