WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] the latest dom0 tree

To: M A Young <m.a.young@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] the latest dom0 tree
From: "Jiang, Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 23:09:08 +0800
Accept-language: en-US
Acceptlanguage: en-US
Cc:
Delivery-date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 08:10:05 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <alpine.GSO.2.00.0904201124420.3323@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <E2263E4A5B2284449EEBD0AAB751098401D184852A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.GSO.2.00.0904201124420.3323@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcnBoucNRTp8sO+/RwKeZnMceJlnngAJrfSg
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] the latest dom0 tree
Thanks for your information. Seems xen-tip/next is changed in April 14 while 
push2/xen/dom0/master is still in Mar 29. Can I assume all patch is hackery or 
push2/xen/dom0/master is in xen-tip/next already? If yes, I will base my patch 
on xen-tip/next. 

Thanks.
Jiang Yunhong

xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Apr 2009, Jiang, Yunhong wrote:
> 
>> Hi, Jeremy, when I check the latest dom0 tree, seems the latest
>> changeset is still in March 29 as shown below. As I'm new to git, so
>> I want to confirm I didn't make anything wrong, and there is no
>> changes after that? And also, all pv_dom0 work should base on
>> xen/dom0/hackery branch, am I right?
> 
> xen/dom0/hackery was left behind a bit during the attempt to
> get dom0 into
> 2.6.30 during the merge window. Alternate branches to use are
> push2/xen/dom0/master and xen-tip/next . I believe the plan is that
> xen-tip/next will become the branch to use, but not all the patches
> from the other branches have been copied across yet.
> 
>       Michael Young
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>