Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NX related build failure in latest pv_ops dom0 hackery tree

[Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>]

Please,view dmesg.system and xm dmesg reports for AHCI box.
Kernel has been built via :-
git://git.saout.de/gitweb/linux-dom0-pvops.git
First report contains one stack trace ( exactly as it happened with 2.6.29-tip
on Q9550 ) . I will check it on C2D AHCI box shortly.

Boris.

--- On Tue, 4/14/09, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NX related build failure in latest pv_ops dom0 hackery tree
To: "Christophe Saout" <christophe@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tuesday, April 14, 2009, 12:53 PM

Christophe Saout wrote:
> In the meantime, you can try to use that tree:
>
>
 http://git.saout.de/gitweb/?p=linux-dom0-pvops.git;a=summary
>
> It's the latest tip.git merged with one of the push branches from
> Jeremy's git repo and cherry-picked commits from the backend, blkback
> and netback trees plus minor merge conflict and compile problem fixups.
> It seems feature-complete to me, stable and is able to run DomU domains
> without problems.
>   

Does it work with AHCI drives for you?  It isn't for me (nor my remerge, 
so I'm not sure what has broken in the meantime...).

    J

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

d with 2.6.29-tip
on Q9550 ) .

Boris.

--- On Tue, 4/14/09, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NX related build failure in latest pv_ops dom0 hackery tree
To: "Christophe Saout" <christophe@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tuesday, April 14, 2009, 12:53 PM

Christophe Saout wrote:
> In the meantime, you can try to use that tree:
>
> http://git.saout.de/gitweb/?p=linux-dom0-pvops.git;a=summary
>
> It's the latest tip.git merged with one of the push branches from
> Jeremy's git repo and cherry-picked commits from the backend, blkback
> and netback trees plus minor merge conflict and compile problem fixups.
> It seems feature-complete to me, stable and is able to run DomU domains
> without problems.
>   

Does it work with AHCI drives for you?  It isn't for me (nor my remerge, 
so I'm not sure what has broken in the meantime...).

  
  J

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

dmesg.system
Description: Binary data

dmesg.xen
Description: Binary data

kernel.config
Description: Binary data

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel