[Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix cpufreq HW-ALL coordination handle

To:	"xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	[Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix cpufreq HW-ALL coordination handle
From:	"Liu, Jinsong" <jinsong.liu@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 13 Apr 2009 18:55:02 +0800
Accept-language:	en-US
Acceptlanguage:	en-US
Cc:	Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date:	Mon, 13 Apr 2009 03:55:48 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	Acm8JkwwZrnLXt9QTTqSlDD9/TZusw==
Thread-topic:	[PATCH] Fix cpufreq HW-ALL coordination handle

Fix cpufreq HW-ALL coordination handle

Currently cpufreq HW-ALL coordination is handled same way as SW-ALL.
However, SW-ALL will bring more IPIs which is bad for cpuidle.
This patch implement HW-ALL coordination handled in different way from SW-ALL,
for the sake of performance and reduce IPIs. We also suspend/resume HW-ALL dbs 
timer for idle.

Signed-off-by: Yu, Ke <ke.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
               Liu, Jinsong <jinsong.liu@xxxxxxxxx>
               Tian, Kevin <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>

px-xen-hwall.patch
Description: px-xen-hwall.patch

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix cpufreq HW-ALL coordination handle