| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] 10 million cycles disappearing
After looking into this a bit more, it appears to be
only an artifact and a race in my measurement code
(buried in macros where it was non-obvious).
Thanks for the help and sorry for the noise.
P.S. Average of tmem ops including page copy and
compression/decompresion is in the 20K-50K cycle range.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tian, Kevin [mailto:kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 10:47 PM
> To: Dan Magenheimer; Xen-Devel (E-mail); jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] 10 million cycles disappearing
>
>
> In your later test with memory allocation, is it still same case that
> only some samples approach 10M, or the average close to 10M?
> If average cost is high, then xenoprofile could be useful here to
> show hotpot to you.
>
> Thanks,
> Kevin
>
> >From: Dan Magenheimer [mailto:dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx]
> >Sent: 2009年4月9日 8:47
> >
> >The problem still occurs on latest tip (c/s 19515). :-(
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Tian, Kevin [mailto:kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 6:33 PM
> >> To: Dan Magenheimer; Xen-Devel (E-mail); jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx
> >> Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] 10 million cycles disappearing
> >>
> >>
> >> I remember that some previous post (from Jan?) solved some heavy
> >> operation incurred in some special action of writable page
> able. Not
> >> recall the detail, but your description about subop with memory
> >> allocation leads me to that part...
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Kevin
> >>
> >> >From: Dan Magenheimer
> >> >Sent: 2009年4月8日 7:54
> >> >
> >> >I've been seeing a possible performance problem off and on
> >> >and I've spent some time tracking it but haven't made much
> >> >progress and have to give up for now, so I thought I'd at
> >> >least document what I know and see if it sounds familiar
> >> >to anyone.
> >> >
> >> >The problem: Something in Xen seems to periodically take about
> >> >10M cycles. I think it is an interrupt and I think it is
> >> >taking a lock related to memory allocation and holding
> >> >it for a LONG time (i.e. 10M cycles or close).
> >> >
> >> >I am measuring inside a hypercall using TSC, taking a TSC
> >> >reading at entry to the hypercall code and at exit. Xen
> >> >is not pre-emptive, so it can't be switching context or
> >> >something, right? Nearly all of the readings are less
> >> >than 100K cycles, but some samples are "huge" and
> >> >usually at 9M-10M cycles. Since I am recording the max
> >> >difference between the TSCs, the max "huge" grows over
> >> >a long period of time, but eventually converges close
> >> >to 10M (and this is a 3Ghz processor). I can see
> >> >it grow using "watch". And I've NEVER seen a reading
> >> >over 10M.
> >> >
> >> >I am able to disable interrupts and still take
> >> >measurements. Roughly half of the measurements
> >> >occur when doing a hypercall-subop that does no
> >> >memory allocation and roughly half occur when doing
> >> >a hypercall-subop that DOES do memory allocation.
> >> >With interrupts disabled, the subop that DOES
> >> >memory allocation still asymptotically approaches
> >> >10M. The one that does NOT do memory allocation,
> >> >stays relatively small.
> >> >
> >> >I'm currently measuring on Xen 3.3.1 but I think I've
> >> >seen similar results on xen-unstable. A single 2-vcpu
> >> >domain is running (in addition to domain0).
> >> >
> >> >Does any of that sound familiar? Any smoking guns?
> >> >
> >> >_______________________________________________
> >> >Xen-devel mailing list
> >> >Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> >> >
> >
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home