Re: [Xen-devel] 2MB page PV guest support clarification

You remark about aliasing prompts me to ask a general question about
that. I am currently mapping physical to virtual 1-1 (because that is
what minis-os has always done) as well as mapping parts of that to
other areas in virtual memory. Both of these are RW mappings. Is that
ok? It perfectly possible for me to unmap the 1-1 mappings or make them
RO if I have to.


Any page that is part of a pagetable must be mapped RO in every mapping to it. Attempting to add a page that has RW mappings to a pagetable will fail (either when you make the hypercall to add the PTE, or when you pin a constructed pagetable or try switching to it).

Thus, you need to be careful with 1:1 maps to remove pages that may become PT pages. It's best to have a PT page allocator that tries to allocate PT's from contiguous regions and then recycles them.

Ok. I need to check this. Certainly I am at some point taking already mapped pages and using them as pagetables. However, I am not getting any errors when adding the PTE. So perhaps the code does the mapping change already.

Mick

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

RE: [Xen-devel] 2MB page PV guest support clarification, Ian Pratt

Next by Date:

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen dom0: Initialize xenbus for dom0., Jeremy Fitzhardinge

Previous by Thread:

RE: [Xen-devel] 2MB page PV guest support clarification, Ian Pratt

Next by Thread:

Re: [Xen-devel] 2MB page PV guest support clarification, Keir Fraser

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]