|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: pv_ops & gntdev?
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>> Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>>
>>> Hm, I hope not. Doesn't it always end up using set_pte*?
>>>
>>
>> ptep_get_and_clear_full();
>>
>> See zap_pte_range() in mm/memory.c
>
> Ah, right. It could be changed to use ptep_modify_prot_start/commit.
> That would make it batchable too. Slightly less good for native.
Hmm. One more Q: How is pinning used? Is a process pinned all the
time? Or can it happen that the pages are unpinned in case it does hang
around idle for a while? Is there some way to prevent a process from
being unpinned?
I somehow feel like checking out mmu notifiers first ...
thanks,
Gerd
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] pv_ops & gntdev?, Gerd Hoffmann
- [Xen-devel] Re: pv_ops & gntdev?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- [Xen-devel] Re: pv_ops & gntdev?, Gerd Hoffmann
- [Xen-devel] Re: pv_ops & gntdev?, Gerd Hoffmann
- [Xen-devel] Re: pv_ops & gntdev?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- [Xen-devel] Re: pv_ops & gntdev?, Gerd Hoffmann
- [Xen-devel] Re: pv_ops & gntdev?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- [Xen-devel] Re: pv_ops & gntdev?, Gerd Hoffmann
- [Xen-devel] Re: pv_ops & gntdev?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- [Xen-devel] Re: pv_ops & gntdev?,
Gerd Hoffmann <=
- [Xen-devel] Re: pv_ops & gntdev?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- [Xen-devel] Re: pv_ops & gntdev?, Gerd Hoffmann
- [Xen-devel] Re: pv_ops & gntdev?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- [Xen-devel] Re: pv_ops & gntdev?, Gerd Hoffmann
- [Xen-devel] Re: pv_ops & gntdev?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- [Xen-devel] Re: pv_ops & gntdev?, Gerd Hoffmann
- [Xen-devel] Re: pv_ops & gntdev?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- [Xen-devel] Re: pv_ops & gntdev?, Gerd Hoffmann
- [Xen-devel] Re: pv_ops & gntdev?, Gerd Hoffmann
- [Xen-devel] Re: pv_ops & gntdev?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
|
|
|
|
|