Re: [Xen-devel] PV domU with 255GB boot failure

[Mark Williamson <mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

It looks like you don't have Mercurial (the hg command) installed.  You should 
install your distribution's package for this, it is used to manage the Xen 
source and the build process uses it to download the Linux kernel.

The appropriate place to post questions of a "How does this work?" / "What 
does this mean?" nature is to the xen-users mailing list.  Also, you're more 
likely to get an answer if you start your own e-mail thread - send an e-mail 
to xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with a Subject that briefly describes your 
question.  Don't reply to another e-mail, else people won't notice your 
question is separate.

Cheers,
Mark

On Tuesday 17 February 2009 09:29:34 venkatesh k wrote:
> hi sir, i am currently doing in m.a.m college of engg in trichy. i am
> using final year project using xen 3.3.1. the xen 3.3.1 source run on
> following error displayed how to solve the problem plz tell me..
> the following error make world command running:select-repository:
> Searching `.:..' for linux-2.6.18-xen.hg
> select-repository: Ignoring `.'
> Unable to determine path to Linux source tree.
> Falling back to linux-2.6.18-xen Mercurial repository.
> Cloning http://xenbits.xensource.com/linux-2.6.18-xen.hg to
> linux-2.6.18-xen.hg. /bin/sh: hg: not found
> make[3]: *** [linux-2.6.18-xen.hg/.valid-src] Error 127
> make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/mamce/Desktop/Missel/xen-3.3.1'
> make[2]: *** [linux-2.6-xen-install] Error 2
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/mamce/Desktop/Missel/xen-3.3.1'
> make[1]: *** [install-kernels] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/mamce/Desktop/Missel/xen-3.3.1'
> make: *** [world] Error 2
>
> On 2/17/09, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 17/02/2009 04:00, "Mukesh Rathor" <mukesh.rathor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Could the fix be made in the loop above the above mentioned loop in the
> >> function where it's ensuring init mappings cover kernel+tables to check
> >> for pud also?
> >
> > That would be the correct thing to do. I think the kernel should be
> > self-sufficient in this respect, rather than relying on libxc to do this
> > pud setup for it. It should be an easy kernel fix, so long as you can
> > guarantee to be able to easily allocate the page for the pud. :-)
> >
> >  -- Keir
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-devel mailing list
> > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel