WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Tracebacks from dom0 pvops changeset 2342

To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Tracebacks from dom0 pvops changeset 2342
From: M A Young <m.a.young@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 18:57:54 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 10:58:56 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <499074EF.7010401@xxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0902082218060.14840@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <498F896A.5070505@xxxxxxxx> <alpine.LFD.2.00.0902090830290.14781@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <499074EF.7010401@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23)
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:

M A Young wrote:
On Sun, 8 Feb 2009, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:

Hm, these should have been fixed by x86-fix-__supported_pte_mask.patch...

It looks like that patch was commented out of the series file in 2342 so I didn't apply it. Does that mean it is included somewhere else (the kernel I started from was essentially 2.6.29-rc2), or has it gone missing by mistake?

Well, it has been accepted upstream, so I think the x86.patch should already contain that change. Its possible you're seeing a separate bug with the same symptoms, which would be unfortunate.

The patch was missing, but it is my fault it isn't there. It looks like I forgot to do an hg update, so my kernel was actually based on changeset 2336 not 2342, and that is the one before x86-fix-__supported_pte_mask.patch
went in.

        Michael Young

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel