| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] page ref/type count overflows
On 29/01/2009 11:07, "Tim Deegan" <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Does this look acceptable?
>
> Seems fine, which is to say I don't see much advantage but have no
> objection. :) Please try to make it clear in the comments which fields
> belong to a page which _has_ a shadow and which to a page that _is_ a
> shadow.
I'd agree with Tim. I perhaps have a slight preference for keeping it all in
one struct (i.e., the new approach) but I'm happy either way.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home