WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] iperf problem with Windows SMP VM

To: James Harper <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] iperf problem with Windows SMP VM
From: ANNIE LI <annie.li@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:02:21 +0800
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 19:05:19 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <AEC6C66638C05B468B556EA548C1A77D0155044A@trantor>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Oracle Corporation
References: <49759F0E.7050404@xxxxxxxxxx> <AEC6C66638C05B468B556EA548C1A77D0155044A@trantor>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)
James,

Thanks a lot. I will have a test on xen3.3.1.

Thanks
Annie

James Harper wrote:
Hi

I am developing Window pv network driver and hit a problem now.

My server use Xen 3.1.4 and have 2 physical CPUs. When I create two VM
with 1 VCPU on a same server, iperf performance is OK between those
    
two
  
VM, but there is performance degradation between those 2 VM when i
increase VCPU from 1 to 2.
This problem occurs in QEMU mode too.

Does Xen 3.1.4 has such problem or anything wrong in my configure
    
file?
  

Annie,

I think it would be worthwhile testing Xen-3.3.1 as I get comparable
performance on SMP vs UP under 2003 (around 80% I think).

Under XP, SMP and UP performance are much closer, due to the way
interrupts are handled (according to the guys on the ntdev list).

James
  
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>