WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] RE: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] Modification of credit scheduler re

To: NISHIGUCHI Naoki <nisiguti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] RE: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] Modification of credit scheduler rev2
From: "Su, Disheng" <disheng.su@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 12:55:16 +0800
Accept-language: en-US
Acceptlanguage: en-US
Cc: "Su, Disheng" <disheng.su@xxxxxxxxx>, George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "sakaia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <sakaia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "aviv@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <aviv@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:56:53 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <496E99B9.3010906@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4949BC2C.4060302@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <BB1F052FCDB1EA468BD99786C8B1ED2C01D260D043@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <496E99B9.3010906@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: Acl2tcCkYU65ro9CQFudHyZYGCtoVgAFZHng
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] RE: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] Modification of credit scheduler rev2
NISHIGUCHI Naoki wrote:
> 
>>              c. the limitation of weight for guest B. I have to set the 
>> weight
>> of guest B to 10. It may not be reasonable in real usage case. 
> 
> Is copying large files in background on guest A indispensable?
> In my test, guest A runs only video playing.
> I think that my approach couldn't solve this issue.

You know, guest A is the primary guest to end user, so we can't make any 
assumption about the user's operation in guest A, which is the big challenge 
for client virtualization IMO.
Weight, Cap, Boost credit, are all can be used together, or adding new 
mechanism, such as static priority as Kevin said, to solve the problem.

> 
>>      Do you have the experience with audio? I don't know I have properly
>> configured your scheduler or not. Hope the your scheduler can solve
>> the audio issues also.  
> 
> Sorry, I don't have the experience with audio.
> But I'll try to reproduce your configuration and investigate.
> 

Glad to see you have interest with audio also. Any problem when you reproduce 
the audio issues, pls let me know.

> Regards,
> Naoki Nishiguchi
> 
>> 


Best Regards,
Disheng, Su
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel