On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 13:51 +0100, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 11:11:07AM +0100, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> >> Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx> writes:
> >>
> >>> http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenParavirtOps
> >>
> >> It says:
> >>
> >> Xen/paravirt_ops has been in mainline Linux since 2.6.23, though it is
> >> probably first usable in 2.6.24. While I wouldn't put it in production
> >> just yet, for normal desktop/developer workloads it has proven to be
> >> pretty stable.
> >>
> >> Is this statement still well founded?
> >
> > Yeah, I guess that should be modified.. suggestions?
> >
> > pv_ops based domU kernels are shipping at least in Fedora 9 and Fedora 10..
> > how about other distributions?
>
> Debian Lenny will ship 2.6.26 kernel with save/restore/migration
> patches backported from 2.6.27. That also works OK. I use the
> 686-bigmem flavour only, but others successully run the 64 bit version
> AFAIK.
Unfortunately There's no 64 bit version of the domU pvops kernel in
Lenny. 64 bit domU first appeared in 2.6.27, I think, and the backport
was too involved for me to consider.
What Lenny will have is a kernel with the SUSE forward ported non-pvops
patch for 32+64 dom0 and 64 domU support (the -{686,amd64}-xen
packages), in addition to the -686-bigmem pvops kernel for 32 bit domU.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Home