| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] RE: question about hvm vhpet
On 21/11/08 15:26, "Dan Magenheimer" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Agreed.... at least unless/until Dave Winchell's hpet
> work gets resubmitted and accepted, hpet is not reliable
> as a timer for most guests. And some OS's will
> always automatically choose hpet if it is enabled
> even, in some cases, if another clocksource was intended.
>
> So off is better... but we should be aware that turning
> it off may provoke significant timer issues for some
> customers who upgrade. The ideal solution is to get
> Dave's code in and leave the vhpet default to on, but
> I don't think Dave has had any time to work on this
> (and I haven't had time either).
vhpet is now based on vpt.c.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home