WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] poweroff in 3.2 and 3.3

To: 'Jan Beulich' <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] poweroff in 3.2 and 3.3
From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:19:57 +0800
Accept-language: en-US
Acceptlanguage: en-US
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, 'Keir Fraser' <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 00:20:24 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <49252B4B.76E4.0078.0@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <49242037.76E4.0078.0@xxxxxxxxxx> <C549C36E.29329%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <0A882F4D99BBF6449D58E61AAFD7EDD601E23B3F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49252B4B.76E4.0078.0@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AclK6G6T9ChwuvcNRvSyYyG7tTi2mQAACs5w
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] poweroff in 3.2 and 3.3
>From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx] 
>Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:18 PM
>>
>>Comment says "Only s3 is using this path", instead of "this path
>>can only be used by s3". :-) At that time cpu online/offline is not
>>supported and thus only s3 is the user on that path. If you look at
>>latest xen upstream with cpu offline support, that comment went
>>away.
>
>But my point is that this is wrong (no matter how it's 
>worded): entering
>S5 also uses this path, and in that case there's nothing that stops
>non-current vCPU-s of dom0.

I see. You're right. But that seems not matter as you're doing S5. :-)

Thanks,
Kevin
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel