Re: [Xen-devel] monitoring all xenstore 'traffic'

To:	James Harper <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dietmar Hahn <dietmar.hahn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] monitoring all xenstore 'traffic'
From:	Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:51:02 +0000
Cc:	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date:	Fri, 07 Nov 2008 02:51:56 -0800
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<AEC6C66638C05B468B556EA548C1A77D0154FAFE@trantor>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	AclAwtZhiWVpQioYRgOzfvyM7UmXsQAASfEwAACu45Y=
Thread-topic:	[Xen-devel] monitoring all xenstore 'traffic'
User-agent:	Microsoft-Entourage/11.4.0.080122



On 7/11/08 10:35, "James Harper" <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> Should xend restart without any problems?
> After restarting xend, xenstore-ls just says:
> 
> "
> tool = ""
>  xenstored = ""
> vm = ""
> Segmentation fault
> 
> Message from syslogd@bitvs2 at Fri Nov  7 21:33:34 2008 ...
> bitvs2 kernel: invalid opcode: 0000 [3] SMP
> "

Restarting xenstored is a bad idea. ;-)

That said, 'xend restart' shouldn't restart xenstored.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] monitoring all xenstore 'traffic'