| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH]: Fix Xen domU boot with batched mprotect
Jan Beulich wrote:
Is e.g. 256Mb tiny? KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE these days is 512Mb... Indeed,
when it was 40Mb (up until a few releases ago), this indeed wouldn't
matter.
Well, the real point is that anyone doing a test on such high kernel
addresses is almost certainly buggy anyway. I guess a more precise
statement is that it returns well-defined results for any va the calling
code could reasonably be using, not for any random bit pattern.
But I think we're getting into the weeds here.
J
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home