Re: [Xen-devel] Paravirt-ops UP bug, status check

steven maresca wrote:
> In testing the 2.6.27-rc6 kernel, I at one point neglected to enable
> SMP, and encountered the same issue as described in the following thread
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/8/31/115 (to which you replied with a hint
> toward a confirmed workaround).
>
> I don't have any issues running a SMP kernel; just wondering whether
> a) it's easily fixed or b) if UP should be avoided? Do you need more
> debug information?

The fix for this should already be in Linus's git tree, or it will be
soon.  There's no big downside to running an SMP kernel anyway though.

    J

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-devel] Paravirt-ops UP bug, status check, steven maresca Re: [Xen-devel] Paravirt-ops UP bug, status check, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <=

Previous by Date:

[Xen-devel] Paravirt-ops UP bug, status check, steven maresca

Next by Date:

[Xen-devel] Documentation for adding a config file platform parameter, Langsdorf, Mark

Previous by Thread:

[Xen-devel] Paravirt-ops UP bug, status check, steven maresca

Next by Thread:

[Xen-devel] Documentation for adding a config file platform parameter, Langsdorf, Mark

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]