|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] dm-ioband + bio-cgroup benchmarks
To: |
linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx, containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Subject: |
[Xen-devel] dm-ioband + bio-cgroup benchmarks |
From: |
Ryo Tsuruta <ryov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Sep 2008 21:04:18 +0900 (JST) |
Cc: |
fernando@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xemul@xxxxxxxxxx, kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, agk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Delivery-date: |
Thu, 18 Sep 2008 05:04:43 -0700 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Hi All,
I have got excellent results of dm-ioband, that controls the disk I/O
bandwidth even when it accepts delayed write requests.
In this time, I ran some benchmarks with a high-end storage. The
reason was to avoid a performance bottleneck due to mechanical factors
such as seek time.
You can see the details of the benchmarks at:
http://people.valinux.co.jp/~ryov/dm-ioband/hps/
Thanks,
Ryo Tsuruta
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|