| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] c/s 18470
>>> "Liu, Jinsong" <jinsong.liu@xxxxxxxxx> 18.09.08 09:39 >>>
>Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Likewise the calls to cpufreq_{add,del}_cpu() from the CPU hot(un)plug
>> paths seem to consider the Intel case only (as the functions
>> themselves are Intel specific).
>
>[Jinsong]:
> Not quite sure about your question. I just check the code:
> 1. cpufreq_add/del_cpu() is arch-independent, since all arch-dependent
>part has been handled by cpufreq_driver->init/exit().
> 2. cpu online/offline path is also arch-independent.
> Would you please tell me more clear where is intel specific?
In that platform_hypercall.c calls cpufreq_add_cpu() only for Intel CPUs,
but the hotplug code calls it and cpufreq_del_cpu() always. This ought
to be consistent I believe.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home